Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Motorcycles / Scooters
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-08-2008, 10:45 AM   This thread is in the EcoModder Project Library | #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Glassboro, NJ
Posts: 88

Kawi - '04 Kawasaki Vulcan 800 Classic
90 day: 56.48 mpg (US)

The Monte - '99 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Z34
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)

Mazda - '10 Mazda 3i
90 day: 35.15 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Changing sproket

Let's pretend for a minute that I know nothing about sprokets and why or how it would be beneficial to install a larger one. Also I had heard that putting in a larger one would make the bike more difficult to drive, anyone on what becomes more difficult and why?

__________________
Goal one= 30mpg on The Monte by changing the nut that connects the steering wheel to the seat.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-08-2008, 11:13 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tallmadge, OH
Posts: 313
Thanks: 6
Thanked 26 Times in 21 Posts
Sprocket, where I come from, is the toothed gear most forward on a bike. It is turned by some sort of motor or by the rider via the cranks on a bicycle. The larger the front sprocket, the harder it is to turn and the higher the speed at a given rpm.

If you are talking about the rear wheel sprocket, it is turned by the chain and rotates the wheel. The smaller it is, the harder it is to turn and the faster the wheel will turn, given the same rpm at the front sprocket.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 11:42 AM   #3 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038

pimp mobile - '81 suzuki gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Volkswagen Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
FWIW, I went from a 47 tooth rear sprocket to a 37 tooth (I have a 15 tooth front sprocket FYI). It is a significant reduction in rpm for a given vehicle speed.

Now my 4th gear is like what my 6th gear used to be. It took a little getting used to when taking off in first, and when selecting gears for a given situation, but I like it and am getting good mpg results with the setup. It's all instinctive now.

When cruising I am at a lower RPM with more throttle opening (more efficient generally), and if I need the acceleration to get up a hill or something, I can always downshift.
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 12:02 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Glassboro, NJ
Posts: 88

Kawi - '04 Kawasaki Vulcan 800 Classic
90 day: 56.48 mpg (US)

The Monte - '99 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Z34
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)

Mazda - '10 Mazda 3i
90 day: 35.15 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So if I make the rear sprocket smaller I will be able to go the same speed, but at lower rpms? So instead of say my 4th gear being good for 35mph to 50 mph it would shift to maybe 45 mph to 60 mph? Just trying to get a feel for this. How difficult was it to get used to and how hard is it to change to a smaller sprocket? Do I need to change anything else, or just the chain tension? (smaller sprocket would equal more slack in chain)
__________________
Goal one= 30mpg on The Monte by changing the nut that connects the steering wheel to the seat.

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 07:45 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 117

GMC Sonoma - '94 GMC Sonoma
90 day: 36.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by saunders1313 View Post
So if I make the rear sprocket smaller I will be able to go the same speed, but at lower rpms? So instead of say my 4th gear being good for 35mph to 50 mph it would shift to maybe 45 mph to 60 mph? Just trying to get a feel for this. How difficult was it to get used to and how hard is it to change to a smaller sprocket? Do I need to change anything else, or just the chain tension? (smaller sprocket would equal more slack in chain)
You can figure out exactly what the speed difference will be with a different size sprocket, at a given RPM.

First you count the teeth on both of your current sprockets. Lets say it is 15T front and 45T rear. That is a ratio of 45:15 or 3:1.

Now lets say you change the rear to 40T. You now have a ratio of 40:15 or 2.666:1.

If you divide the old ratio by the new ratio you get 1.125. This means that your new sprocket ratio will make the bike go 1.125 times as fast at the same RPM as the old sprocket ratio.

If it used to go 35 mph at 3000 RPM now, with the new smaller rear sprocket, it will go 35 X 1.125 (39.4 mph) mph at 3000 RPM.

The difficulty of changing the sprockets is entirely dependent on what bike you are talking about. Back in the day, it was typically a one hour job on most bikes I had ever owned. The chain will almost certainly need to be shortened if your new sprocket is more than a tooth or so smaller.

Again, depending on your bike, it may be much simpler and cheaper to change the front sprocket. Just do the math as above to learn what size will make what difference.

Last edited by Gregte; 08-08-2008 at 07:54 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 09:40 PM   #6 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038

pimp mobile - '81 suzuki gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Volkswagen Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
I didn't have a larger front sprocket commonly available myself, so I looked around for the smallest rear sprocket that would fit my hub/chain size. I found JT Sprockets: Motorcycle & ATV Sprockets to be invaluable and cross referenced the materials there to something that would fit off a completely different bike.

Your 17 tooth front sprocket is already the largest commonly available (as was mine) but you could go down to 38 teeth (from 42) on the rear. Just shop/ebay around for a 1997-2000 Suzuki TL1000 S V/W/X/Y rear sprocket, or by number it is a 499.38
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!

Last edited by dcb; 08-08-2008 at 09:48 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 09:53 PM   #7 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038

pimp mobile - '81 suzuki gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Volkswagen Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
regarding the chain, I just kept the original chain and front sprocket and shortened it by eye with the new rear sprocket in place. They have special tools for breaking chains, but I managed with a c-clamp and a socket and some swearing (and a new master link)
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2008, 10:59 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 117

GMC Sonoma - '94 GMC Sonoma
90 day: 36.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb View Post
regarding the chain, I just kept the original chain and front sprocket and shortened it by eye with the new rear sprocket in place. They have special tools for breaking chains, but I managed with a c-clamp and a socket and some swearing (and a new master link)
My preferred way to shorten a chain was to grind the heads off of two pins with a grindstone. Then a small hammer and punch will easily push that pair of pins through. We had a chain breaking tool at the shop I worked at but I never used it. Grindstone worked better.

Also, if you do not have the option of changing the front sprocket, the math that I pointed out above can be simplified. Just consider that if you put on a rear sprocket that is 10 percent smaller, for instance, than your existing sprocket you will raise the speed of the bike 10 percent at a given RPM, that simple.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 10:44 AM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Glassboro, NJ
Posts: 88

Kawi - '04 Kawasaki Vulcan 800 Classic
90 day: 56.48 mpg (US)

The Monte - '99 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Z34
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)

Mazda - '10 Mazda 3i
90 day: 35.15 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So making the front and rear sprockets closer to a 1:1 ratio is what I'm trying to do? And this is without changing any gearing?
__________________
Goal one= 30mpg on The Monte by changing the nut that connects the steering wheel to the seat.

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2016, 12:48 AM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: usa
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
chocie sprocket good

If you never want a bent sprocket danscomp.com/457128.php?cat=PARTS sorry i can't post with link

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Worth changing gears to imporve Fuel Economy? 2000mustang fan EcoModding Central 33 07-22-2008 08:31 PM
Will I Get a Big Boost from Changing the ECU Chip? Axaday EcoModding Central 3 07-03-2008 10:39 PM
Saving power by changing computing habits and hardware NoCO2 Saving@Home 34 02-26-2008 07:23 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com